Blog
The NCAA Said No to a Two-Semester Season. What Does That Mean for Your College Prospect?
By Gloria Cid-Stitt - Founder, U.S. Soccer ParentNovember 7, 20264 min read
On Nov. 6, 2026, Division I schools voted down the two-semester men's soccer season. For families of college prospects, this means that nothing changes for now: men's college soccer stays a fall sport, with up to 25 games packed into about 10 to 13 weeks. I understand why it failed, but the bigger questions behind the proposal, about rest, late bloomers and who gets to decide, still deserve a real conversation.
The plan would have started in 2027-28: up to 18 games in the fall, up to 10 more starting in mid-February, the same 25-game cap and a spring championship (NCAA). Because it passed the Division I Cabinet with less than 75% support, every Division I school got the chance to overturn it, and it took 241 of the 361 to do it (ESPN). On Nov. 6, the NCAA confirmed that two-thirds of schools had rescinded it.
GOAL reported 247 votes to rescind. That included 106 schools that don't sponsor men's soccer, and nearly 70% of the schools that do (GOAL). That last number matters. It would be easy to read this as schools without soccer deciding soccer's future. Most soccer schools said no, too.
Both sides had a point
The case for the change came from inside the game. Maryland coach Sasho Cirovski called the current season "archaic," adding, "It's been the same since 1959" (ESPN). The student-athlete representatives on the Cabinet supported it too, for more rest and recovery between games and less weekday travel (NCAA). Clemson's Mike Noonan put it simply: "At the end of the day, aren't our student athletes the reason we have jobs in the first place?" (Front Office Sports).
The case against came from the people who run whole athletic departments. Toledo pointed to "increased costs," "facility conflicts with spring sports" and "staffing demands" (ESPN). Florida Gulf Coast athletic director Brian Barrio wrote that "ADs need to think about 15-30 other sports, not just soccer" (Front Office Sports). Wofford's Scott Kull said meaningful change "requires broad institutional support and a model that is sustainable for programs at every level of NCAA Division I" (GOAL).
Those aren't excuses. Fields, trainers and budgets are shared, and spring is already crowded. The vote settles the calendar. The conversation it started is worth continuing.
Join U.S. Soccer Parent
Free for every soccer parent.
Save articles, get the free newsletter, and find guidance tuned to your state, your kids' ages, and the pathway your family is on.
The questions that matter to families
After the vote, Jeremiah White, a former professional player and entrepreneur, asked several questions in an Instagram post, including "Who creates the value?" and "who gets to decide?" Those are the two I think families should sit with. To his credit, he gives both sides their due: he says part of him understands the result, and that schools need clarity on how any change would be paid for.
Who creates the value? The players do. And by the time a college coach calls, most families have already paid for years of club fees, travel, showcases and ID camps. White makes a point in his video that I keep coming back to: college soccer is where "kids that might not be ready at 17, 18 ... can emerge from a soccer system a little later and maybe become a pro." That is the case for college for a lot of our kids. Not every player is ready for a pro decision at 17, and a college program that develops players over four years is worth a lot.
Who gets to decide? The schools, through a membership vote. Players had a voice through their Cabinet representatives, and they backed the change. Families don't have a formal say. That isn't a complaint about this vote. It's how the system works, and it's worth knowing when you're deciding where your son spends the next four years.
If your son is being recruited
For a recruit, the vote means the college season you're planning around is the one that exists today: up to 25 games in a fall season that runs 10 to 13 weeks (ESPN), on top of a full class load. In the spring there are no college games, so players can move to USL League Two for the spring and summer.
Cirovski argues the short season is a big reason so many top young players now skip college for MLS Next Pro and other routes. Whether or not you agree with his numbers, it's a good reason to weigh the college and pro paths side by side instead of assuming one.
And this probably isn't over. Cirovski said "everything else will be on the table," and that interested schools will start "exploring different opportunities to play in a split season" (ESPN). He has floated a separate tier for those schools (Front Office Sports). A program you're looking at today could look different by the time your son gets there.
What I'd ask a college coach
- How do you keep players fresh when the fall schedule gets packed?
- What happens in the spring? Do players train with you, play in a summer league, or both?
- If the calendar changes in a few years, how would that affect a player's time in your program?
- What does development look like for a freshman who isn't playing much yet?
Families don't get a vote on the calendar. We do get to ask questions, and the answers will tell you a lot about a program.
For grade-by-grade dates, start with our College Timeline and Recruiting Deadlines guide.
Written by Gloria Cid-Stitt - Founder, U.S. Soccer Parent